marriage bed symbol

marriage bed symbol

Sunday, October 28, 2018

How Profane Erotica Makes You A More Efficient Lover


There are a lot of articles and therapists out there talking about how wives are feeling devastated and betrayed by their husbands looking at “porn”.  A primary reason that I’m hearing about why they feel betrayed seems to be because they are worried about their husband comparing them to the women in porn.

This line of thinking I feel may be somewhat off-course and may end leading couples to run around in circles when trying to deal with a challenge of profane erotica in their relationship. I would like to share a different perspective on this that may help.

What Wives Imagine…

Why do women feel threatened when their husband looks at profane erotic materials? One therapist I listened to shared a client’s description of her husband’s experience with “porn”. The client described what she visualized as glossy, airbrushed, salacious images of naked - or even half naked - supermodels with large breasts. However anecdotal, I couldn’t help but take note of this being yet another stereotypical definition of the term “porn”.

What if we Eliminate “Attractive”?

If wives feel threatened by these over-glamourized creatures, then the logical alternative would be for husbands and wives to seek out profane erotic materials made with ‘ordinary’ or ‘less attractive’ woman instead, so the wives wouldn’t feel so threatened, right?

In a husband’s focused mind, he may feel that it would be less threatening to his wife if the erotic materials he views are of women less physically attractive than her and may make this compromise to ‘fix the problem’.

Yet, we know intuitively (from a gospel perspective) this would also be wrong. So ‘attractiveness’ is a slippery factor to use for consideration of why it shouldn’t be viewed. It’s not the attractiveness of the women (necessarily) that draws him to look at the sex acts.

It’s the Comfort of the Vagina…And the Goal of Orgasm

Even historical luminaries such as Benjamin Franklin expressed this same paradigm in a letter to a friend[i] – and here, to me, is the real answer to why men look at profane erotica. If we want to understand why, we must understand this key to a man’s thinking.

This is another reason that convinces me the term “porn” or “pornography” is a terminological trap. Profane erotica is so much more than naked supermodels. Profane erotica is (by pornographers’ own admission) designed to shock to viewer. The more shocking, the better it sells.

Thus, there is profane erotica today that depicts obese people having sex, elderly couples having sex, average-looking married couples having sex in very slow, sensual and non-violent ways, handicapped people having sex, pox scarred and flabby women engaging in bondage, and yes, even attractive women and men engaging in sex.

It doesn’t matter what form it takes – all of it defiles the sacredness of the beautiful, God-created sexuality of men and women.

If the “porn” husbands are drawn to isn’t all about naked super-models bouncing their voluptuous bodies around and giving perpetually aroused come-hither looks, then what is it that really draws men to profane erotica?

The Answer is…Efficiency

Most men are designed to be efficient. Our brains are compartmentalized. We can open a task box in our heads, get into it, stay in it, and prefer to focus on just that task until it’s done. We don’t like to jump around in our heads from task to task or unrelated idea to unrelated idea – we will if we must – but it is not natural for us to do so and makes us even more inefficient.

 Most men tend toward very linear thinking. We look for the shortest and most efficient route to get to the goal. We produce millions of sperm constantly and can have sex multiple times because even our bodies are designed to be efficient. And when we reach our efficient ejaculation goal, our bodies reward us with a powerful euphoria-inducing mix of endorphins.

When “in the mood”, men are oriented (from a strictly physically fragmented standpoint) to look for the most efficient way to reach that goal. Get in the vagina, ejaculate, get the orgasm - so they can clear their mind and savor the orgasm. And the way to get the most out of an orgasm, is to have the full experience is with a soft, warm, comforting woman.

If a man’s only experience and knowledge of sex is what he experiences with profane erotica, he enters a relationship with the paradigm that women must feel the same way about sex as he does – or as the girl’s character in the film are being portrayed. In addition, everything in the film is focused on the woman’s vulva or anus or mouth – because THAT is the GOAL.

Women tend to not feel the same way. They are not largely “goal and efficiency” oriented. They are relationship-oriented. Sex is not so much about the physical act, as it is about intimacy and relationship.

When these two paradigms come together in the bedroom, they usually bump heads.

As sex therapist Laura Brotherson teaches, this is a good thing. If men and women both had the same testosterone levels and libido as men, nothing would get done. They’d be having sex all the time. That is anecdotal, of course, and while we’re speaking in broad stereotypes here, men are perfectly capable of exercising restraint and functioning with the drive they have, as men also like to eat and sleep.  Men, having the drive they do is good, because otherwise the sex could die out altogether.

Men would lose interest in doing and in courting the wife, because the goal is gone and it’s just not efficient. In fact, when men get low testosterone, this is exactly what happens…he loses interest in sex.

The great irony of the situation is, to maintain efficiency in relationships, we must be inefficient.

Inefficiency = Efficiency

Profane erotica is a GREAT and VERY efficient way to get men into their sex box, stir up their libido and get them from zero-to-sixty ready for sex in no time. Therefore men are attracted to it. They love that feeling of virility and the desire for the endorphin goal. They may even convince themselves that it is good for their marriage, because it keeps the sex alive. There are even secular sex therapists who prescribe the couple watching profane erotica together for this very reason – it’s a very efficient way to “spice things up” and get one or the other or both in the mood for sex very quickly.

The problem is, women are not efficient and the two bump heads with profane erotica, because it creates the delusion in men that they can also get their wife quickly aroused in no time also. When he tries, it may just turn her off – which in turn leaves him sexually frustrated. This in turn has led him to just “take care of himself” through masturbation, eventually an affair, or just resign himself to living in a sexless marriage.

Profane Erotica Is Efficient, But We Can’t Be Efficient with Our Wives

It is in this way that profane erotica makes us men terrible lovers. This is a major reason it has no place in our lives and especially no use in our marriages.

Fortunately, we husbands don’t give up, because we like our sex and will do whatever is necessary – even change our paradigm about how to reach the goal of good sex if someone will just show us how.

Women also like sex, but they must be warmed up first and this takes time.

“President Howard W. Hunter advised: ‘Be faithful in your marriage covenants in thought, word, and deed. [Profane erotica], flirtations, and unwholesome fantasies erode one’s character and strike at the foundation of a happy marriage. Unity and trust within a marriage are thereby destroyed’ “[ii]

Understanding the Line and the Circle

So how do we warm a woman up?  First, we must understand how she is different.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach taught[iii]:

“Men are lines and women are circles.  The truth is that anatomically, it’s what
separates men and women, this is not an arbitrary metaphor, it reflects our very bodies. Men are lines, and women are circles.

Men have a very linear approach to life. Women have a very cyclical approach to life…

I mean, isn’t the whole reason that women get so frustrated with men is that men are so linear, that in bed, they’re a bunch of lines. This isn’t about love or connection. This is a rush to the finish line…

…, the only way to get men and women together is by re-understanding what sex is all about…”

Beverly Whipple of Rutgers University also found comparing men and women to lines and circles appropriate in helping us understand our different sexual and intimate needs as males and females:[iv]

“Women can differ from men in many ways. One is that women have a variety of sexual responses. Men may also, but men get into this linear model of only one way to respond and that’s what they get used to.

They also equate orgasm with ejaculation, which is not so, they’re two different phenomenones. When I talk to couples about sensuality and sexuality, I show two different ways that people respond – in terms of their sexual experiences.

One, is goal directed. I use the analogy of a stair case where each step leads to the next step: Touch, Kiss, Caress, Vagina, Penis, Contact, top step = Orgasm.

These are people who are goal directed. There are also people who are pleasure directed.

Here, I use the analogy of a circle where any activity on the perimeter of the circle can be an end in and of itself and I have added question marks where people can add what they like…

One is pleasure-directed and one is goal-directed, and then you look at the stereotypes we have of men and women. Most men are goal-directed, looking for the end point of the goal – orgasm. Most women are pleasure-directed. Many people are comfortable holding hands, cuddling, there’s many ways that they have sensual and sexual pleasure.

So then you have to look at a relationship and see if one person is goal-directed, one person is pleasure-directed. Are they aware of this? Do they communicate this to their [spouse]?  So I think that we know that most men are linear and goal-directed, and most women are more circular.”

With men being linear, entertaining profane erotica exacerbates this natural tendency to be goal-oriented. Removing it from our lives enables us as men to be more conscientious that other people see and feel and respond to things differently than we do.

There may not be a quick fix or quick turn on anymore when we remove profane erotica, but it appears most of our wives won’t mind. Men sometimes need warming up too, and while quickies are not out of the question, they should not be the normal fare.

Are Both of You Getting ‘Your’ Sex?

If we men efficiently go after our sex as the normal fare, our wives get hung out to dry. Where’s their sex? Where are the things the husband did that made her fall in love in the first place? After a while, they will start to resent us, and may not even know why.

Men, do you take the time to learn what her “sex” is? It may not be like yours. Chances are very good that it isn’t, but it doesn’t make your ‘sex’ wrong. Just different.

What affection is she wishing she got more of? Does she really want to have an orgasm every time or is she okay giving you your sexual release if it involves some touching and talking and other expressions of affection as Beverly Whipple mentions above?

At the altar of marital intimacy, sex should always be something that brings you closer together and never something that becomes a reason to push you apart. 

Pushing you apart is Satan’s plan, not the Lord’s.

Laura M. Brotherson also presents another helpful formula to assist husbands in understanding their wives’ arousal cycle, and what it really takes to get her from zero to sixty.  Here is the link to her lecture. I recommend starting at 27:00  - https://youtu.be/bUQ0Fv_KGb4

For the same purpose, I also recommend her books And They Were Not Ashamed as well as Knowing Her Intimately.





[i] Franklin, Benjamin. “Advice to a Young Man on the Choice of a Mistress”, (1745). https://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bdorsey1/41docs/51-fra.html

[ii] Hunter, Howard W., Conference Repot, Oct. 1994, 67; or Ensign, Nov. 1994,50
[iii] Boteach, Rabbi Shmuley, Kosher Sex, Fisher Brothers Media, 2006
[iv] Whipple, Beverly, Rutgers University, Men Are Lines, Women Are Circles, Big Think, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22BvgteaUgE



Wednesday, October 17, 2018

Gospel Doctrine or Cultural Myth? If You Love Someone, You Should Always Support Their Decisions, No Matter What.


I came across an article by Dave Willis this week and was impressed by this statement: 

 Faithful are the wounds of a friend who corrects out of love and concern,
But the kisses of an enemy are deceitful because they serve a hidden agenda.” Proverbs 27:6

A true friend will tell you a difficult truth. Someone who has an agenda will tell you what you want to hear. 

I’ll never forget the story of my Aunt Jan, [who] decided to leave her husband after a year of marriage. She showed up on her mom’s doorstep with her suitcase and told her mom she was getting a divorce because she had married the wrong person and didn’t want to be with him anymore. 

Her mom lovingly told her to go home to her husband and that she wasn’t welcome in her home until she went home and worked on her marriage. Aunt Jan was shocked, but it was the wakeup call she needed. 

She went home to my Uncle John and they remained married and in love for fifty years until his death a couple years ago. Sometimes, real love requires us to speak difficult truth instead of just supporting someone’s bad choices.[i]

What feels like a nurturing virtue can instead feed corruption if we ignore the warning signs and need for discipline, so our loved ones can be whole, happy and productive individuals.

“Wanting to help is natural. But when you want to help more than the other person wants to help themselves, you substitute for their personal power instead of adding to it. The harder you row the boat, the less they row.

Psychologists call this enabling, enmeshment, codependence, and “the drama triangle” (or “the rescue triangle”). Many of these insights came from addiction-recovery work, because it was observed that addiction exists because the addict is enabled by others. Enablers pride themselves on their compassion. 

They hate the results, but refuse to do anything differently because it’s not “compassionate.” They go down with the ship.”[ii]

Love doesn’t mean throwing yourself under a bus to cover up a child or spouse’s dysfunctional behavior. Although painful at times, (as they say) sometimes “you have to be cruel to be kind”.

Pain can be good for us, as our subconscious is programmed to move us away from that which causes pain and toward comfort and pleasure.[iii] If the bad behavior is rewarded with pain (emotional or consequential) and helps the individual move away from the bad behavior (because they subconsciously associate it with pain), this can be the most loving thing we can do for them.

Likewise, rewarding good behavior with love and affection and comfort can be a powerful motivator to continue good behavior.

If we enable them and reward them with love and comfort for their bad behavior, there is nothing to motivate them to stop the bad behavior. What we think is being nurturing and loving can in fact be the most heartless and unloving action we can do for our loved one.

For this reason, it’s okay to set up boundaries where bad or sinful behavior is concerned. It can be a more loving thing to let our spouse know that there are relationship deal breakers. For example, abuse (physical, mental, emotional, verbal, spiritual or sexual – which includes unreasonable withholding of sexual intimacy), addiction, infidelity, unrepentant breaking of temple covenants, etc.…

Enabling a spouse in these behaviors, turning a blind eye to them or even helping to cover them up can be the most unloving thing you could do for your spouse and children. Making it stop may even require separation (not divorce, though that is an option if the spouse is persistently unrepentant).  

A protection you do have in your favor is the spouse’s bad behavior does not have bearing on your temple blessings and covenant promises – if you are being faithful and trying your best to keep your marriage healthy.

President Joseph Fielding Smith said “If a man or a woman who has been sealed in the temple for time and eternity should sin and lose the right to receive the exaltation in the celestial kingdom, he or she could not retard the progress of the injured companion who had been faithful. Everyone will be judged according to his own works, and there would be no justice in condemning the innocent for the sins of the guilty.”[iv]

In addition, Pres. Brigham Young said “It is not my general practice to counsel the sisters to disobey their husbands, but my counsel is—obey your husbands; …But I never counselled a woman to follow her husband to the Devil.”[v]
 
Were he alive today, his council to the men would likely be the same, as other apostles have also said. Honor each other, but honor and follow the Lord, above all.[vi]

The belief thatif you love someone, you should always support their decisions.” is a cultural myth. This belief is not supported in the scriptures, the words of the prophets or even professionals.





[i] Willis, Dave. Eight Popular Myths That Could Ruin Your Marriage.  1 Nov 2017. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/davewillis/8-popular-myths-ruin-marriage/2/

[ii] Breuning, Loretta G, Ph.D. Marry for Compassion, Repent for Enabling. Psychology Today. 14 Sep 2014. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-neurochemical-self/201409/marry-compassion-repent-enabling

[iii] Glenn, David, Beginner to Advanced Practitioner Training Course & Self Development in Psychotherapy Hypnotherapy Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) Cognitive ... - NLP - CBT. Clinical Psychology, Amazon, ISBN-13: 978-1521207994,  2008

[iv] Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R McConkie, 3 vols. [1954-56], 2:177
[v] Discourses of Brigham Young, pg. 200-201. Also in the Teachings of Brigham Young, Lesson 23 and D&C 121:34-46.
[vi] See “Marriage – Watch and Learn” by L.Whitney Clayton (Apr 2013); “His Spirit to Be With You” by Henry B. Eyring (Apr 2018), or “Celestial Marriage” by Russel M. Nelson (Oct 2008), among others, for deeper information